
Tortdog:
QUOTE |
Well, I kind of disagree that the officer set him up via the interview. He asked questions which answers confirmed whether or not he was guilty. But simply answering the truth to those questions and NOT having done what the officer claimed would have resulted in innocence. |
QUOTE |
For example, the officer asked if he used his left hand. The Senator said no. But the officer saw his ring which was on his left hand. The Senator said he never removed the ring. So the Senator is lying or the officer is lying. |
QUOTE |
Don't forget, there HAVE been past allegations of similar conduct by the Senator. |
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 1089 100%
QUOTE |
But isn't the appropriate thing to do is to have ANOTHER officer who can set the interview and then make each other (officer and senator) face/cross talk and see if there are any discrepancies? |
QUOTE |
Right! So why is everybody automatically assuming that the Senator is the one lying? (I am not saying he isn't, I am pretty sure he is but everybody is condemning him and the only thing we have is his word against the officer's). |
QUOTE |
Sen. Craig has been dealing with allegations about his sexuality for years. Back in 1982, there were rumors that he was under investigation for having sexual relations with congressional pages (Craig was in the House of Representatives at that time.) This past fall, Craig again denied speculation from the internet and the Idaho press that he is gay. Craig has pointed to these past allegations as another reason why he pleaded guilty in Minnesota, and in his words, 'overreacted.' "Let me be clear: I am not gay and never have been," said Craig in his statement. |
The officer asked him questions once he set the ground rules. At the very beginning, the officer said this could go one of 2 ways. One was that he agreed to guilt and there was a quiet fine and no jail time or the other was a court case where the officer would testify. Under those ground rules, there really was only one answer for the Senator. I am not saying he set him up. Again, I believe by the way the Senator answered the questions he was already setting up his defense for a court case...basically admitting not to admit anything, but pay the fine and leave it at that. However, setting up the remainder of the interview after laying down that ground work pretty much left the senator no options and what I saw was a chance for a dishonest officer to do pretty well for themselves if they were so inclined.
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 863 86.3%
SEN. CRAIG MAY RECONSIDER RESIGNATION, SPOKESMAN SAYS
Sen. Larry Craig of Idaho may reconsider his resignation if he is cleared of a disorderly conduct charge to which he pleaded guilty last month, his spokesman told CNN on Tuesday.
Ref. https://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/09/04/cra...tion/index.html