John Roberts

John Roberts - Politics, Business, Civil, History - Posted: 17th Sep, 2005 - 2:00pm

Text RPG Play Text RPG ?
 

Posts: 4 - Views: 462
Post Date: 13th Sep, 2005 - 1:22pm / Post ID: #

NOTE: News [?]

John Roberts

I COME WITH 'NO AGENDA,' ROBERTS TELLS HEARING

Chief justice nominee John Roberts on Monday promised to approach the law with "a certain humility" and told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee that he has "no agenda" on the bench.
Ref. https://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/12/rob...ings/index.html

Sponsored Links:
Post Date: 13th Sep, 2005 - 2:44pm / Post ID: #

John Roberts
A Friend

Roberts John

I welcome John Roberts to what will eventually be a painful, muck-raking campaign into his personal life and politics - after all, he's a conservative, so the media will eat him alive. But in all seriousness:

"My job is to call balls and strikes, not pitch or bat."

1. That's all I needed to hear. A Supreme Court Justice's role, more or less, is to interpret an individual's case according to the U.S. Constitution. His job is not to "apply justice" (especially when it's just to "some guy's" point of view) or otherwise stray from the words set forth by our founding fathers or by amendment afterward. He or She is there to interpret the Constitution - a monkey lawyer could it (I mean literally: a monkey in a suit citing precedent could do it. He'd have a cute monkey rolodex. Maybe a cute monkey briefcase - I dunno).

2. There's no "two"...

... this time.

Post Date: 14th Sep, 2005 - 11:22am / Post ID: #

NOTE: News [?]

John Roberts History & Civil Business Politics

ROBERTS ARTFULLY DODGES HOT QUESTION

In a day punctuated by flashes of hostility and humor, Judge John G. Roberts Jr. on Tuesday acknowledged a constitutional right to privacy and said overturning precedent was a "jolt to the legal system."
Ref. https://deseretnews.com/dn/view/1%2C1249%2C...54414%2C00.html

Post Date: 17th Sep, 2005 - 2:00pm / Post ID: #

NOTE: News [?]

Roberts John

Umpiring the Constitution

For decades, defenders of the status quo have railed against "activist judges." Before chief justice nominee John Roberts could get a word out at this week's confirmation hearings, senators were lecturing him about the need for judges to be umpires, not players.

Roberts quickly embraced the umpire comparison. But over the course of three days, he quietly but repeatedly made a second point: Judges have to field the cases that come before them
Ref. https://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20050916/...theconstitution


 
> TOPIC: John Roberts
 

▲ TOP


International Discussions Coded by: BGID®
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Copyright © 1999-2024
Disclaimer Privacy Report Errors Credits
This site uses Cookies to dispense or record information with regards to your visit. By continuing to use this site you agree to the terms outlined in our Cookies used here: Privacy / Disclaimer,