The 9.11 Conspiracy

The 9 11 Conspiracy - History, Historic Profiles - Posted: 7th Aug, 2006 - 12:03pm

Register Login Text RPG Play Text RPG ?     New: 5 45 88 Why Join Help Register/Login via:Register/Login via:
Welcome Guest

+  1 2 3 4 
Posts: 31 - Views: 13796 Rating: 1/10 out of 1 Votes
9/11 - September 11th - Ground Zero - Twin Towers - Let us examine photograph / film history to see if there is more than meets the eye
Post Date: 9th Apr, 2006 - 3:38am / Post ID: #

The 9.11 Conspiracy


There are many explanations about what happened on September 11th, 2001. Here is a documentary that deals with it. View it and then post your views below.

See it now: Source 8

Post Date: 25 April 2018 - 12:28 pm / Post ID: #


Sun Tzu Quote "The general who does not understand these, may be well acquainted with the configuration of the country, yet he will not be able to turn his knowledge to practical account." -- Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Post Date: 9th Apr, 2006 - 9:31pm / Post ID: #

The 9.11 Conspiracy
A Friend

The 9.11 Conspiracy Profiles Historic & History

I watched about thirty minutes of the clipping, and I have mixed emotions about it. I know many people asked the question of where the wreckage for the 757 that ran into the Pentagon went, and according to many there was no plane that hit. The only problem I have with that are eye witness accounts. My fiance's step-father is retired air force, and so he had many friends who worked up there during that time. Everyone that he talked to remembers clearly seeing bits and pieces of the plane. While some of their points are quite plausible, such as no damage being done to the very top of the building until it collapsed. That does raise my eyebrows, but even by watching this segment, I could not rule out that a plane never hit the pentagon.

Post Date: 10th Apr, 2006 - 1:14am / Post ID: #

Admin + Architect
[?] CPosts: 37,553
Posts: 47,730
Avg: 8.4 Post(s) / Day
Activity: 100%
[+] Gain: 5,165.40 FP
Charm: 330

Conspiracy The

I watched the whole thing and it does bring up some interesting questions. I would like for some photography / camera experts to say what they think. I do find it interesting that people could not ascertain the difference between a huge plane, a small passenger plane and a missile hitting the Pentagon. I also thought the idea of the tail wing not taking out the roof very true. What really happened that day?

Post Date: 10th Jul, 2006 - 6:22am / Post ID: #

The 9.11 Conspiracy
A Friend

Conspiracy The

If the New York Times could tell stories about the phone tapping and the way the government tracks monies related to possible terrorists, why not do an expose on this conspiracy? The US government has done some shady things in the past but nothing that rises to this level. After reviewing the report I still think the most plausible explanation is the official one. I believe someone would have talked by now if the conspiracy were true. If the government could keep a secret than Nixon would never have had to resign and Clinton would not have been impeached. Still I am concerned about the encroachment of our liberties thanks to the Department of Homeland Security and phone tapping. We in the free world must guard our freedoms.

Post Date: 10th Jul, 2006 - 9:46am / Post ID: #

The 9.11 Conspiracy
A Friend

The 9.11 Conspiracy

Listen, if you want a real exposes on this story and conspiracy, then you need to buy or rent "9/11 In Plane Sight". This uses all the available video and tons of eye witness interviews that tell a story that is difficult to justify as a simple terrorist sight. In fact, if anyone actually wants a copy of this, I would be willing to send them a copy at my charge for shipping. I didn't make the video, don't know the person who made it, just believe that video, photographic, and eye witness evidence is enough to make you upset and angry at the lies the media and government have told about all this. To me, the pentagon was obviously not hit by a plane when no wreckage remains, it originally makes a hole less than 20 feet wide, and the 'heat' isn't even enough to burn up the phone books laid bare by the "crash". The towers have dark secrets that have eye witnesses to them like multiple explosions starting from the bottom going up, heard and seen by people at ground zero when this all went down. Conspiracy indicates that someone believes it but has little evidence, this is a full blown cover up by our government, and I believe the evidence is significant and impressive. Feel free to PM me or email me if you would like a copy of "9/11 in Plane Sight", you won't be disappointed.

Post Date: 11th Jul, 2006 - 12:00am / Post ID: #

The 9.11 Conspiracy
A Friend

The 9.11 Conspiracy

Konquererz, I gooogled "9/11 in plane sight" and there was an advertisement for a DVD. The DVD had a preview and it was a part of the above referenced video sited by NEO. I may be wrong, but I believe the video sited by NEO and the DVD sited by you are one in the same.

Concerning the hole in the Pentagon. I'm not a structual engineer and I don't know what kind of a hole would be made by an airliner. I would assume that the pentagon is made of some pretty tough stuff since it houses the military and would be a natural target during war. With that said, when they showed the untouched book on the filing cabinet next to the damaged section, that made me wonder. I would also believe that some plane wreckage could be found but I'm not an aeronautical engineer either.

Concerning eyewitnesses. I don't put much stock in them.

What disturbed me the most was the video of the plane that hit the second tower. The flash before impact and the supposed structure underneith the plane.

Post Date: 23rd Jul, 2006 - 11:24am / Post ID: #

The 9.11 Conspiracy
A Friend

The 9.11 Conspiracy

Arg, I think its the same video to, not sure how I missed that.

Concerning the pentagon, I just find it interesting when the "new" video released by the pentagon is essentially the same video we have seen, but with a fiery streak going across the screen, but still no plane. Now this was before the "plane" hit, and still no plane.

I guess what bothers me is that there are paper phone books siting in the open on floors that are not on fire. The only explanation given for not having any wreckage was the intensity of the fire. So intense that paper escaped burning, as well as file cabinets and chairs, but not a shred of plane? Something is fishy here.

To bad all we will ever have are conspiracy theories and questionable video. I don't believe it has to be the government who did it, they could be covering it up. Suppose a missile hit the pentagon and not a plane. Which is better to feed to the public, a missile launched terrorist attack near the pentagon on american soil, or a hijacked plane?

Post Date: 7th Aug, 2006 - 12:03pm / Post ID: #

NOTE: News [?]

The 9.11 Conspiracy History & Historic Profiles


Kevin Barrett believes the U.S. government might have destroyed the World Trade Center. Steven Jones is researching what he calls evidence that the twin towers were brought down by explosives detonated inside them, not by hijacked airliners.

Guest please SHARE: "The 9.11 Conspiracy" on:

+  1 2 3 4 
Sponsored Links:

OPTIONS FOR DISCUSSION: About, How, When, Where, Why of The 9.11 Conspiracy
Options Fast Reply Add Reply Add Poll

No Registration Required!

We welcome input from visitors:
Add Comment As A Guest
Guest, please be considerate by using the appropriate tags as well as checking your grammar before submitting or it will be deleted. See: Constructive Posting Policy.

Tip TIP: Press above button ONCE only. If you come back here via the [Back] button on your browser then you will need to click [More Options] button (below) first in order to re-enable your ability to Post.

> TOPIC: The 9.11 Conspiracy



Donate Compare Membership
International Discussions Coded by: BGID® ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Copyright © 1999-2018
Disclaimer Privacy Report Errors Credits

Latest Topics

Key: Background for Upgraded Members
Updated every 5 minutes See More

Latest Member Intro

Newest Members

Updated every: 31 minutes

World Issues

USA vs Syria:
versus U.S.A. Is Syria the next Iraq? By Opinion 1.1 Day(s) Ago
China vs USA:
USA versus China versus Chinese versus Americans The role of its Army, Politics, and Status in the World. By Willis 3.3 Days Ago
North Korea vs South Korea:
versus North Korea Vs. South Korea By News 7 Days Ago
USA vs North Korea:
North Korea Nuclear Weapons
versus USA This country is no Iraq. What is the USA going to do? What will be the outcome? By Trans 1 Week Ago
Russia vs. Syria:
Syria vs Russia By Opinion 1 Week Ago
China Navy:
Chinese Aircraft Carrier
China Navy Beware the new Naval power, they are planning to come on stream with big naval might to match their ground forces. Chinese Aircraft Carrier - Chinese Navy By Chaser 10th Mar, 2018 - 3:09pm
North Korea Military:
Discuss  North Korea Military This Thread is about the North Korean Military itself - the kind of army, navy, and air force they have. By Wizard 15th Jan, 2018 - 9:36am
Japan vs North Korea:
North Korea versus Japan versus War With Japan By Swell 17th Oct, 2017 - 4:17pm
USA vs Germany:
Germany versus U.S.A. By News 20th Sep, 2017 - 3:44pm
China Military:
China Military Technology Preparing For China. China is growing their military. China Military Technology - can it keep up with the US? By Abnninja 5th Mar, 2017 - 5:25pm