QUOTE |
No one will notice if they do not make themselves knowledgeable of this as a Doctrine and ordinance established by Joseph Smith. |
QUOTE |
15 And now it came to pass that the people of Nephi, under the reign of the second king, began to grow hard in their hearts, and indulge themselves somewhat in wicked practices, such as like unto David of old desiring many wives and concubines, and also Solomon, his son. |
QUOTE |
27 Wherefore, my brethren, hear me, and hearken to the word of the Lord: For there shall not any man among you have save it be one wife; and concubines he shall have none; |
Well, really to go in depth with this you need to visit the primary Thread where we Discuss this. The points you have an answer, but this is mostly about the modern stance of the Church on it to the point of becoming 'political' about it.
I've just come from a meeting to discuss the new Proposition 8 in California, to amend the state constitution defining marriage as legal only for a man and a woman. Proposition 22 in 2000 - which created a law or statute defining marriage as between man and woman only - was recently overturned by a state supreme court judge, saying it was unconstitutional (according to the state constitution). (A state law can be changed according to legal process, such as in the courts; the state constitution would have to be changed through another amendment.)
The church is not "officially" involved with promoting Prop 8, but let me tell you they are the driving force behind it. The organizational levels are amazing! We are sanctioned to use church membership lists for phone calls about this, which has been taboo for as long as I can remember. The man leading the meeting tonight (at the stake center) has been "called" by the stake president to head the committee in our local area. The stake president stated that announcements about volunteer efforts and meetings will be allowed in Sunday bulletins and in classes. This is huge!
Perhaps one day this will be fired up again in the US Congress. For now, the fight is on in California.
Farseer:
QUOTE |
The stake president stated that announcements about volunteer efforts and meetings will be allowed in Sunday bulletins and in classes. |
While I agree that the church should not be involved in political activity as far as endorsing a specific candidate or party, or discussing those issues from the pulpit in sacrament meeting, I have to say that I think they need to get involved in activism for particular issues -- such as this one -- that directly affect the church.
To sit back and do nothing while same-sex marriage is being fought out in the political arena is more wrong than getting involved, in my opinion. I'm not sure how I feel about announcements in the bulletins/programs, but we have to - as an organized group - fight for what's right, stand up for what we believe in, and not let evil prevail by being "politically correct." This isn't about the separation of church and state, this is concern for the spread of society-degrading behavior and laws that promote it.
I've been assigned to assist one of the area coordinators with my singles group. We'll do everything we can. Here's the website: www.protectmarriage.com (not a link).
Well, if you read my thoughts in the same sex marriage thread (LDS) you will know how I feel about it:
Source 3
QUOTE |
I'm not sure how I feel about announcements in the bulletins/programs, but we have to - as an organized group - fight for what's right, stand up for what we believe in, and not let evil prevail by being "politically correct." |
QUOTE |
but an opinion of whether we should impose by legislation OUR beliefs to others |
Dbackers:
QUOTE |
Are you saying that the Church should be bared by law from expressing its views on certain issues, or are you saying that it is immoral for the Church to take a stand on Moral issues? |