
NEVER!
Religious discussion is the only way to find the truth. To many myths and ancient beliefs exist today and to many people thing that only one way exists and everyone else is wrong. If we fail to find all the knowledge available to us, fail to discuss and share what knowledge each of us has, then the truth will never be found and we will live in subjugated darkness to what we are told and not what we can learn for ourselves.
QUOTE |
When you Discuss Religion with someone and they disagree, do you become offended? |
Discussing religion with someone who disagrees with me or my beliefs is not generally offensive. If someone starts attacking my beliefs, I probably would disengage from that person. We don't have to allow ourselves to be overcome by anger - which would generally cause the "discussion" to disintegrate into an argument. Being offended is a choice we make in every situation.
I have a question along the lines of this question that has struck a cord with me. I have heard several times, out side this thread but verified in here, that if someone is "attacking" your beliefs that they would disengage from the conversation. What is defined by attacking and is attacking really offensive to you or do you just not want to speak to a person "attacking" your faith?
If someone is attacking someone elses faith, should not you faith be able to stand up to anything? The purpose of attacking ones faith is to make the logically and reasonably defend what they are all about. And is attacking being considered in the same breath as insulting? I can attack what someone believes without insulting them. There is a difference between saying you are wrong and can't prove other wise (an obvious attack), and saying that your beliefs are stupid or that you are stupid for believing them (thoroughly insulting).
So is there a distinction between an attack on your religion and insulting you because of your religion and does that make a difference in whether or not the religious disagreement is considered offensive?
QUOTE |
What is defined by attacking and is attacking really offensive to you or do you just not want to speak to a person "attacking" your faith? |
QUOTE |
If someone is attacking someone elses faith, should not you faith be able to stand up to anything? |
QUOTE |
The purpose of attacking ones faith is to make the logically and reasonably defend what they are all about. And is attacking being considered in the same breath as insulting? I can attack what someone believes without insulting them. There is a difference between saying you are wrong and can't prove other wise (an obvious attack), and saying that your beliefs are stupid or that you are stupid for believing them (thoroughly insulting). |
QUOTE |
So is there a distinction between an attack on your religion and insulting you because of your religion and does that make a difference in whether or not the religious disagreement is considered offensive? |
QUOTE |
The purpose of attacking ones faith is to make the logically and reasonably defend what they are all about. And is attacking being considered in the same breath as insulting? |
QUOTE |
should not you faith be able to stand up to anything? |
First we must understand that we always choose to be offended. You can be as nice about something as possible, but someone will always be offended, because they choose to, and the fact of the matter is most people choose to be offended. In fact, our Constructive Posting Policy goes into detail about how one can avoid offending others, and the key is not to become personal. For instance, someone may say that African Tribal religions are stupid and only idiots follow it (which may be highly offensive to someone practicing Voodooism or even to some Afro-Baptist links). It may be the view of the person who wants to offend (or not even thinking about what they are saying), but one can always use diplomacy by saying "African Tribal religions are primitive in my opinion".
People have attacked my beliefs many times, but it is more of a comedy to me than offensive, because most of the time their attack is based on third party information or grudges. So in fact disagreements should be left at that: 'disagreements', they do not have to evolve to wars, hate and being offended. If we approach the Discussion of religion with an understanding that someone will NOT believe us or even despise our belief then there will be nothing to be offended about. I will even dare to say this: If you cannot handle it and become offended easily then religion is definitely NOT one of the Topics you should start or reply to, just stay quiet.