Close Topic Options

Nuclear Free World - Page 3

Real Versus Fake Crises
Concealing The Risk of An All Out Nuclear War
By Michel Chossudovsky

We have reached a turning point in our history. The US and its allies are preparing to launch a nuclear war with devastating consequences. Ref. Source 5

World Free Nuclear

Israel refuses to join anti-nuclear treaty:

Israel's nuclear chief said on Tuesday that it was against Israel's interests to join a global anti-nuclear arms treaty and that the UN atomic watchdog was 'overstepping' its mandate in demanding it to do so. Ref. Source 4

Nuclear Free World History & Civil Business Politics

I don't think we'd remove all our nuclear weapons even if we said we would. It's like us saying we will stop using white phosphorus grenades against the enemies and only for signaling.

Page 3 World Free Nuclear

The Military will never give up its Nuclear weapons. Granted they may replace five missiles with one bigger missile and say they eliminated four war heads. But they will not tell you that one they replaced those five with will do more destruction than the five put together. This way the USA can reduce the number of warheads and say they are getting rid of a lot of warheads which will be the truth.

I only see a nuclear free world after all those who have nuclear weapons launch their war heads at one another.

World Free Nuclear

I agree with KNtoran, there will never be a nuclear free world because how can we give up ours when we can never be sure that they have given up theirs? Unfortunately it is something that will always be a threat to ours and future generations. I don't see the nuclear plants going away either, which is good because that is the majority of where my work has been coming from the last few years. In fact I would love to see my home plant, Byron nuclear plant, add two more reactors like they originally intended it to have because that would be a considerable amount of work for years to come.

Nuclear Free World

START Approval

The Senate approves START, the nuclear arms reduction treaty with Russia, a top priority for the Obama administration. Ref. CNN

Nuclear Free World - Page 3

While I dislike being this cynical, this is just a ploy so that we can without total shame talk to other countries about abandoning their programs. It is kind of difficult to tell other countries not to try and build a few dozen while we have thousands on the books. It is just good PR. As KNtoran mentioned, it is just a headcount reduction. You never heard about the fuel being destroyed. Only that there were less warheads on the books.

You could launch them into space and blow them up or just not activate them and let the material wander space aimlessly.

Nuclear Free World Politics Business Civil & History - Page 3

It does look good on paper and it encourages tourism between the two countries and stops Hollywood from producing more Russian spy movies, so yeah it has its benefits.