Nah. I would get banned from the forums lol
The biggest problem that I see with the "global warming" movement isn't that people are concerned that the environment may be changing, that the world climate may increase in temperature, or that mankind might be contributing (or causing) these changes.
It is the poor science that is touted by the neo-Luddites in an attempt to force everyone else to accept their poorly thought out ideas.
I am all for serious research into what is happening. If there is true global warming, or cooling happening, then we need to address it and see if we can make rational, effective changes.
Things like the Kyoto treaty are simply political ploys to implement socialist agendas and bludgeon the West into giving more money to the Third World. This is obvious by the fact that the US and Britain, both of whom have made tremendous strides in reducing air and water pollution, would have born the brunt of the sanctions and fines of the Kyoto treaty. At the same time, China and Russia both of whom are horrendous polluters (and not improving either) would have received special considerations - not for improving, but just for BEING!
Essentially, the Kyoto treaty was another attempt to subject the US and Britain to the tender administrations of the UN and other multi-national bodies. It was, and is, a direct attack against our sovereignity.
If you carefully look at all the articles, websites, and speeches about global warming, you will notice this thread running through them all. They all blame the US. They all urge that the UN or some other "world" body take charge and force the US to clean up its act. Most of them urge that the US donate more money to the UN or to individual countries, either in reparation or to "help them" improve.
It is purely political. You will notice that many of the biggest proponents of global warming (Barbra Streisand, etc.) are the biggest hypocrites (look at her house, the damage she does to coastland, and what she drives and flies in).