
It really depends on who it is and how the character is portrayed. A lot of time the main hero annoys me so I'll either like the sidekick or the villain better.
I know on my other RPG which is based on a book series, I play an evil book character. I know from now on when I read the books, I'm going to have my sympathies with her. And because it's inevitable that she will die at the end of the series, I'll probably be upset because I'm just a dork like that and really get into books.
Truth be told there is no good and evil, yet rather the way people perceive a certian person. In example Jesse James, he was considered an outlaw by most people in that age, but in truth he was a hero to his people because he stood up for what he thought was right. Also in another example General Custard was supposed to be a hero when in fact he was a racist muderer who hated indians and sought nothing but to kill them and in the end he got what he deserved,. no hero would kill weak or defenseless people for no reason but a villain will.
I want to discuss two books: Wicked:The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West and Grendel, both of which are re-tellings (sort of) with the villains in the role of protagonist. Both are deeply philosophical and psychological and are character driven. In both, the author does a great job of tugging at the reader's sympathy. Grendel is never really portrayed as a hero, but he is not portrayed as evil either. When the Shaper, an Anglo-Saxon scop, sings about him and his ancestry back to Cain, Grendel realizes they see him as evil. He cries as he sees his actions from their perspective. It is only after they shun him that he begins his 12 year war on Hart (Herot). Elphaba (every Munchkin's green nightmare) was born green and suffered prejudice because of her skin color. She also had differing religious and political beliefs, which put her on the fringe of society. It was her polical inclination that, even when she was on the cusp of becoming what Glinda did, drove her in the opposite direction. And believe it or not, it was a desire to do good things, to end racism, that put her in that tower on the day that fateful water bucket melted her. What a world, indeed!
Another note: Though the reader knows the outcome, he doesn't want it to happen. Is that sympathy enough for you?
QUOTE (xue @ 2-Jul 04, 5:11 AM) |
If a character is evil and there is no reason given as to why he is evil and he is just plain evil, then it's really difficult to sympathise with him/her, |
I've read a couple of short stories where the main character turns out to be the villain. You are shown the depth of the character, their loves and hates. Then you see that all the hard work they've done, everything they've sacrificed from a different point of view. It makes me think that, all of us, in someone elses eyes are villains. In the books I enjoy the most there is no good and evil just opposing sides and every side has its heros.
Proper character development requires the villain to have a purpose. The occasional trope of "Just wanting to watch the world burn" Is fine, but I prefer they have goals and reasons for doing what they do. I think the authors that participate in Warhammer 40k's Horus Heresy do an amazing job with villain development.