
Finally, but can he hold on to the reign? Seems to me that there are very wild horses down there and unless you have a very strong grip and many on your side you will have both a short life and presidency.
IRAQ SWEARS IN NEW PRESIDENT, PRIME MINISTER
Cementing Iraq's first democratic government in 50 years, one of Saddam Hussein's most implacable enemies took his oath as president Thursday and quickly named another longtime foe of the ousted dictator to the powerful post of prime minister.
Ref. https://deseretnews.com/dn/view/1%2C1249%2C...24619%2C00.html
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 3246 100%
QUOTE |
There were a lot of soldiers who did not want to be involved with the military, much less the war in Vietnam. No one in Iraq has that excuse to use. They all enlisted, signed their names on the dotted line and committed themselves to the US military; all of their own free will. |
International Level: Diplomat / Political Participation: 320 32%
U.S. military, not Iraqis, behind toppling of statue
It was a Marine colonel - not joyous Iraqi civilians, as was widely assumed from the TV images - who decided to topple the statue, the Army report said. And it was a quick-thinking Army PSYOP team that made it appear to be a spontaneous Iraqi undertaking.
Ref. https://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/...5/mn/mn03a.html
U.S. military: Cameraman with CBS credentials detained in Iraq
The military said the cameraman was detained because there was probable cause to believe he posed "an imperative threat to coalition forces.''
Ref. https://cbsnewyork.com/international/Iraq-R...urces_news_html
I believe it would have been inevitable that the statue would have been brought down, so, in my opinion, it doesn't matter who initiated it. The Iraqis were probably still afraid that Saddam would chastise them for disobeying them, but by the time they realized he was no longer in power, I believe the statue would have come down anyway.
International Level: Envoy / Political Participation: 241 24.1%
IRAQIS RALLY AGAINST SADDAM -- AND U.S.
Two years to the day that after Baghdad fell and the Saddam Hussein regime collapsed, tens of thousands of Iraqis gathered Saturday to condemn not only the ousted dictator but also the U.S.-led military forces that deposed him.
Ref. https://deseretnews.com/dn/view/1%2C1249%2C...25077%2C00.html
I think its common knowledge that the US military brought down the statue and conveniently invited the world media to view this. Of course it would have come down anyway, who would want that vile bastard staring down at them?
But I would like to ask what everyone thinks about Bush's comparison with the statue toppling to the bringing down of the Berlin wall. It seems a very strange comparison?
International Level: Negotiator / Political Participation: 453 45.3%
There is simply no comparison.
The toppling of the statue was brought on by the ambition of one man to invade a country on the sole reason to fill a personal vendetta.
The downing of the wall, was the result of a long and hard struggle of brave people, countries (ex poland) to rid themselves of an oppressive social and political regime.
Big difference Edited: MrB on 15th Apr, 2005 - 5:22pm
Especially since your opinion is extremely offensive to some of us, and is founded on your own personal political philosophy, rather than any shred of evidence, please make sure that you DO express it as an opinion.
With the successful elections in Iraq, the fact that the US has not apparently profited from the invasion of Iraq, and the fact that even more horrific oppression was found in Iraq than was originally suspected (but well known to CNN, they just refused to publish it to the world), why do you still hold to this old canard? Even John Kerry has given up on that idea that it was all for GWB's personal vendetta.
International Level: International Guru / Political Participation: 854 85.4%