I can understand how leaders in the past could be democrats. The democratic party hasn't always been so liberal. It hasn't always been so lacking in morals. However, I don't understand how anyone today in the Church can be a democrat. I am not saying I can't understand how they would ever vote for a democrat, because it could conceivably be that the democrat candidate in a given election was the better choice in most key issues, including moral ones, but to be an actual registered democrat. I don't see how one can be and still have a clear conscience when it comes to moral issues. This is just my opinion, but I am sorry, I don't see how you can dismiss the democrat nation platform and all of the social/moral side of issues that they come down in favor of.
Hi can I join the discussion?
I'm not american, but follow the American elections with garat intrest.
And I find your discussion very intresting!
Is it not just a matter of two different ways to view life?
One conservative/republican - and another more liberal/democrat.
It seems to me that some like to demonise democrats, and are portraying them as ultra socialists, pro abortionists, dubble standarded people?
Honestley what are you afraid of?
Have any of you felt what it is like, to live in a society, where pretty much all of the social issues has been taken care of???
I have, - I'm from Denmark, and dont give me any of the stereotype prejudice opinions about Denmark ( or democrats for thet sake ), it is not so bad as its reputation.
My membership of the church, only makes it easyier, to se the good things from the bad. Todecide for a political party, is not the same thing, as to decide on the ansver to a true or false question!
Whats wrong in creating a society, where the children of the poor have the same opprounities to an education or medical care as the children of those with funds?
Does that make me a bad dubble standarded abortionist???
And by the way I would be a democrat if i was living in USA
I guess I'm worse, if I should use some of the wocabulary I have read in this discussion. - So be it.
QUOTE |
Whats wrong in creating a society, where the children of the poor have the same opprounities to an education or medical care as the children of those with funds? |
QUOTE |
Does that make me a bad dubble standarded abortionist??? |
I do not understand how anybody can state that some political party will promote one thing at the expense of moral values.
tenaheff:
QUOTE |
it shouldn't be done at the expense of all moral values that are important to society and that are taught to us as vitally important by our Church leaders. |
QUOTE |
political party affiliation is not an important factor for an LDS member, as long as they are committed to all of the church values and teachings. |
QUOTE |
(Gordon B. Hinckley) Yes...I don't know why you couldn't...We've got lots of Democrats in the church, lots of them, and they are good people. I don't worry about that too much. |
Whether you are damned or saved isn't for me to say. I will say this though, if you vote for someone who supports abortion then you really have little right, in my opinion, to complain when abortion is the norm. If you vote for someone who is in favor of same sex marriage then, again, you have little right to expect anything less than same sex marriage being legally sanctioned. Your political leaders are supposed to represent what you believe. So, while it technically doesn't matter if you call yourself democrat or republican, it definately matters what the moral values are of the person for whom you cast your vote. In general, democrats in the US are strong supporters of same sex marriage and abortion. I am not saying I agree or disagree with either of these topics, that isn't important. I am simply using them as an example of why it does matter what a politicians views are.
As far as your attitude is concerned, I don't think you should take it personally if some of us don't agree with your position. That doesn't mean we are judging you as damned. This is a discussion forum. If we all believed the same things, there would be no discussion.
Concerning my attitude: I can assure you that I do not take it personally, if you or others do not agree with any of my opinions. - I"m still happy and smiling, open and positive.
I also know that it's not up to any human to judge whether anybody is saved or dammed, I"m just trying to make it clear to whoever is reading this, that a person can NOT be judged in moral status, based on what political party they support or are members of.
Discussion forum: Yes - That's why I referred to the tone in the discussion, and I can assure you I have read all the input so far, and there is a tendency to generalizations and to imply that democrats or socialists for that sake do have a lower moral etc.
In general I seek first to understand, then to be understood .
If my way to debate is new to you, or you do not understand it, I can tell you that it is a very common way to debate where I come from.
And here it is perfectly Ok to end a debate with the conclusion - we disagree.
I just couldn't let you keep on padding each others backs in agreement that democrats are 2. rate morally and church member wise.
Therefore I have to oppose to some of the earlier statements.
Quote: Tenaheff
[QUOTE...to be an actual registered democrat. I don't see how one can be and still have a clear conscience when it comes to moral issues.]
[QUOTE...it shouldn't be done at the expense of all moral values that are important to society and that are taught to us as vitally important by our Church leaders.]
Does anybody really believe democrats thinks this way?
Democrat thinks
"We want to find a way to secure education and medical care to the less fortunate, and we will do it at the expense of all moral issues."
If somebody believes this to be the case, then I can se why some is voting republican.
( This is meant to be a thought provoking point, just as the dammed or saved question. )
Fact is that life and politics is not only black or white; there is every tone of color in the whole spectrum,
This applies for democrats as well as republicans and all others, including LDS.
Quote: President Hinckley
[/QUOTE... We've got lots of Democrats in the church, lots of them, and they are good people. I don't worry about that too much.
]
In my opinion, based on president Hinckleys words, and personal experience etc. conclusion must be.
YES. - You can be a democrat, and support LDS standards.
NO. - Every member should NOT be a republican.
The last NO. - is of course a personal matter, and I can perfectly se why the republicans would like every member to support their political view, and I"m also aware of some of their justified concerns.
I think it is good wisdom by the Brethren to warn against political discussion in church, and leave it up to the individual to decide who and what to support.
I"m still happy, and smiling, and I don't worry about that too much either.
QUOTE |
Does anybody really believe democrats thinks this way? |
QUOTE |
Democrat thinks "We want to find a way to secure education and medical care to the less fortunate, and we will do it at the expense of all moral issues." |
I understand both views, since I'm not an American and I don't know much about both parties, all I can say is that it seems like President Hinckley is not very concerned about it when he said:
QUOTE |
(Gordon B. Hinckley) Yes...I don't know why you couldn't...We've got lots of Democrats in the church, lots of them, and they are good people. I don't worry about that too much. |