Add Reply
Related Information to Man on the Moon? Yeah Right!Man on the Moon? Yeah Right! - Page 10 of 13
QUOTE total radiation received on the trip - Page 10 - Sciences, Education, Art, Writing, UFO - Posted: 5th Apr, 2010 - 3:12am
Play Text RPG
- Location:
- International Discussions
- ➢
- ➢ Discuss
- ➢ Sciences, Education, Art, Writing & UFO
Posts: 101 - Views: 14841
Did man really land on the moon? Related Information to Man on the Moon? Yeah Right!
Man on the Moon? Yeah Right! - Page 10
Once we determined the atmosphere of the moon, there was little chance of it being used for human colonization. There basically is no atmosphere on the moon. It is considered to actually be a vacuum. Without that atmosphere to absorb the harmful radiation of the sun, there would be little way for us to live and run electronics without large amounts of shielding and importing of our own oxygen. Also, while the rocks retrieved from the moon were interesting, they had no water or signs of life or anything to help us sustain our lives. After the many trips of the 70's and waning public interest, it was time to move on to something else.
Martian atmosphere does provide ample quantities of CO2 and argon. The CO2 can be used to create fuel to return back to Earth and the abundance of argon provides good shielding from solar radiation. While better than the moon for protection against the solar elements, we would need a huge global warming effort there to sustain life.
So, I personally have little doubt that we went to the moon. Additionally, out government officials could have gotten a lot more votes by giving that money away in other forms rather than television entertainment and trust me...they like staying elected. After Apollo 12 there wasnt nearly as much interest in the program.
Sponsored Links:
Right Yeah Moon the Man
One big thing about this that the Russians contend is that it is impossible for the Apollo 11 and the astronauts to have survived the earth's higher radiation field known as the "Van Allen radiation belt". I actually do wonder how that is possible since none of the astronauts came back with any identifiable injuries or radiation burns. NASA owes it all to good suits.
Man on the Moon? Yeah Right! UFO & Writing Art Education Sciences
I also found it interesting that the temperature goes from 250 degrees above 0 in the sun and 250 degrees below in the shadows. Also there was high levels of a solar flare during the time of the mission. Yes those must have been some pretty tough suits.
Right Yeah Moon the Man
Oliron, and just think those are 1960 suits! Do we even make suits in 2010 that can do half that?
KNtoran, well in this Thread's video source: Source 8 they contend that the astronauts left reflectors which can then be picked up by a photon beam on earth.
Man on the Moon? Yeah Right!
QUOTE The spacecraft moved through the belts in about four hours, and the astronauts were protected from the ionizing radiation by the aluminium hulls of the spacecraft. In addition, the orbital transfer trajectory from the Earth to the Moon through the belts was selected to minimize radiation exposure. Even Dr. James Van Allen, the discoverer of the Van Allen radiation belts, rebutted the claims that radiation levels were too dangerous for the Apollo missions.[102] Plait cited an average dose of less than 1 rem, which is equivalent to the ambient radiation received by living at sea level for three years.[103] The spacecraft passed through the intense inner belt and the low-energy outer belt. The astronauts were mostly shielded from the radiation by the spacecraft. The total radiation received on the trip was about the same as allowed for workers in the nuclear energy field for a year.[104]
The radiation is actually evidence that the astronauts went to the Moon. Irene Schneider reports that thirty-three of the thirty-six Apollo astronauts involved in the nine Apollo missions to leave Earth orbit have developed early stage cataracts that have been shown to be caused by radiation exposure to cosmic rays during their trip.[105] However, only twenty-seven astronauts left Earth orbit. At least thirty-nine former astronauts have developed cataracts. Thirty-six of those were involved in high-radiation missions such as the Apollo lunar missions.[106]
The radiation is actually evidence that the astronauts went to the Moon. Irene Schneider reports that thirty-three of the thirty-six Apollo astronauts involved in the nine Apollo missions to leave Earth orbit have developed early stage cataracts that have been shown to be caused by radiation exposure to cosmic rays during their trip.[105] However, only twenty-seven astronauts left Earth orbit. At least thirty-nine former astronauts have developed cataracts. Thirty-six of those were involved in high-radiation missions such as the Apollo lunar missions.[106]
It takes very little aluminum to protect the body against the radiation doses normally available. Now if there were a specific solar event, the would have little time to get back to the safety of the ship. That might not even be enough.
Additionally, the moon rocks gathered during the Apollo missions match those that were gathered by the Russians Luna missions. However, being actually harvested by men, the Apollo missions were able to take more rocks.
Edited: Vincenzo on 31st Mar, 2010 - 4:34am
Man the Moon Yeah Right! - Page 10
QUOTE (Vincenzo)Now if there were a specific solar event, the would have little time to get back to the safety of the ship.
According to the documentaries against the moon landing they claim that there were solar flares occurring at the same time that would have affected them. This brings us to the other part of the puzzle - are the Russians, even with their top scientists, such unbelievers that they will not venture to the moon and merely just believe what the US has told them about it or is there something more to all of this?
Man the Moon Yeah Right! Sciences Education Art Writing & UFO - Page 10
QUOTE total radiation received on the trip was about the same as allowed for workers in the nuclear energy field for a year.
The radiation recieved on the trips were not that high, but the astronauts that went have shown signs of radiation exposure.
Russians would have loved nothing more than to call the US on a fake landing. Remember we werent too far away from our little Cuban Missile Crisis with the Rusians, so not much love loss at that time. Not to mention, that our rocks matched their rocks. To me it is relatively simple that the Russians didn't feel the need to spend the cash to send someone to the moon to verify that it is not of much use to us humans. Russia focuses on spending much more of their money on nuclear weapons and not heading to the moon. This is the ramp up of the Cold War.
TOPIC: Man on the Moon? Yeah Right!